Posts tagged Liberty Justice Center

    Research ● Labor Unionization Unions

    Five years ago, U.S. Supreme Court strikes down forced public union dues

    July 5, 2023 // Following the Supreme Court ruling, Janus left his job with the state of Illinois to join the Illinois Policy Institute, a free market think tank. The ruling affected union participation around the country. According to the Freedom Foundation, over a quarter of a million workers have left the four largest public unions since the Janus decision, which is a decline of about 10 percent. After the ruling, AFSCME Council 31, the union Janus sued, saw nearly a 20% drop in membership.

    AFSCME Council 31 agency fees condition of employment First amendment Freedom Foundation government union Illinois Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services Illinois Policy Institute Janus Liberty Justice Center Mark Janus National Right to Work Foundation public employee unions Supreme Court Unionization unions

    Research ● Labor Unionization Unions

    CELEBRATING THE HISTORIC JANUS DECISION FIVE YEARS LATER

    June 27, 2023 //

    AFSCME Americans for Fair Treatment Beacon Center Commonwealth Foundation condition of employment Empire Center first amendement Freedom Foundation Goldwater Institute Government Justice Center James Madison Institute Janus Janus Effect Liberty Justice Center Mackinac Center for Public Policy My Pay My Say National Right to Work Paycheck Protection private sector Public Sector State Policy Network Supreme Court Tennessee The Buckeye Institute union dues Unionization unions Workers for Opportunity WorkersChoose.org

    Research ● Labor Unionization Unions

    GOVERNMENT JOBS: 6 THINGS EVERY EMPLOYEE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THEIR JANUS RIGHTS

    May 5, 2022 // If you work for a local, state or federal government entity – a public school district, city hall, a state agency or another government body – you have “Janus Rights”, or the right to decide whether you want to join a union at your workplace. If you decide union membership isn’t for you, then you are not obligated to pay the union at your workplace any kind of dues or fees. The U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed workers’ rights regarding union membership and support on June 27, 2018, in the case Janus v. AFSCME.

    city hall dues employee orientation employee rights employer federal government financially support union First amendment health insurance Janus Janus rights Janus v. AFSCME join union Liberty Justice Center local government membership on-boarding public school district Retirement state agency State government U.S. Supreme Court union fees

    Blog Research ● Labor Unionization

    Lawsuit claiming public-sector employees must be informed of Janus rights dismissed

    April 12, 2022 // Judge John F. Kness of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois dismissed an Illinois teacher’s lawsuit claiming that, under the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling in Janus v. AFSCME, public-sector unions are obligated to inform prospective members of their right not to join or pay fees to a union.

    AFSCME Council 31 Ariadna Ramon Baro Belgau v. Inslee Bennett v. AFSCME Council 31 Cook County Record dues First amendment free speech freedom of association Illinois Illinois teacher’s lawsuit Janie Valentine Janus Janus rights Janus v. AFSCME Judge John F. Kness Lake County Federation of Teachers Lake County Federation of Teachers Local 504 lawsuit Liberty Justice Center Local 504 Ninth Circuit nonconsenting employees Northern District of Illinois pay fees to a union public school teacher public sector unions public-sector employees public-sector union punitive damages rights signing of a union card teacher’s lawsuit Troesch v. Chicago Teachers Union U.S. District Court U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. Supreme Court union card she signed without a knowing waiver of her right Unit School District #60 Waukegan Community Waukegan Community Unit School District #60 workplace equivalent of Miranda warning

    News Article ● Unions

    SCOTUS won’t hear two public-sector union cases

    March 7, 2022 // The U.S. Supreme Court recently rejected petitions in two cases related to public-sector union policy. The last such case the court heard was Janus v. AFSCME in 2018.

    AFSCME Local 52 agency fees Ballotpedia Bill Clinton Bridget S. Bade Circuit Judges class action suit Creed v. Alaska State Employees Association Federal civil rights violations First amendment good faith bargaining Hamidi v. SEIU Hamidi v. Service Employees International Union Judge Andrew Hurwitz Judge H. Russel Holland Judge William B. Shubb Liberty Justice Center Local 1000 lower court for consideration National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Ninth Circuit panel opt-out Patrick Bumatay President Barack Obama President George H.W. Bush President Jimmy Carter public-sector union policy Ronald Reagan Section 1983 Senior Judge Atsushi Wallace Tashima Senior Judge Mary Schroeder Trump Administration U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Judge for the District of Vermont William K. Sessions U.S. Supreme Court Woods v. Alaska State Employees Association Woods v. ASEA