Posts tagged corporate campaign

    Op-ed / Commentary ● Labor Unionization Unions

    On the Matter of Card Check, the Losers Are the Workers

    July 31, 2023 // Neutrality agreements and the card check process they enable deprive employees of information necessary for making informed decisions about unionization and worse, it opens the door to intimidation by taking away workers’ right to a secret ballot in union organizing elections. Neutrality agreements often require employers to accept a process called card check, which replaces NLRB-supervised secret ballot elections. Card check is an open petition process which leaves employees vulnerable to organizing campaigns that are rife with coercion and deception. Card check can fail to reflect employees' true wishes, undermining the democratic principles on which fair representation should be built. Examples of problems with card check include employees being told to sign a card simply to say they attended a union meeting or to get a free t-shirt. Worse, the study documented testimony from a February 8, 2007 U.S. House of Representatives Committee hearing which detailed that the United Auto Workers had “union employees from other facilities actually visit … employees at their homes. The union’s organizers refuse to take ‘no’ for an answer. ... Some employees have had 5 or more harassing visits from these union organizers.”

    Card Check Coalition for a Democratic Workplace corporate campaign Jennifer Abruzzo neutrality agreements NLRB Secret Ballot SEIU shareholders sign cards UAW union corruption union election union organizing unions

    Op-ed / Commentary Research ● Employee Rights Act ERA Labor Unionization

    Opinion: Starbucks baristas who join a union may not get what they bargained for

    April 21, 2022 // Unions historically had little traction in the full- and limited-service restaurant industry. High turnover, combined with a younger workforce that desires flexibility over rigidity, made a poor match for organized labor’s 20th-century-value proposition. Ten years ago, the SEIU made an expensive play to change that, through a campaign called the Fight for $15.

    $15 per hour barista barista organizing Buffalo Bureau of Labor and Statistics cherry-pick locations contract negotiations corporate campaign corruption decertified employee perks Employee Rights Act of 2025 Employment Policies Institute Fast Food fight for 15 gallup Howard Schultz industry campaign intimidation labor movement membership Michael Saltsman National Labor Relations Board New York City normalizing a $15 minimum wage NY organized labor petition PR consultants private sector restaurant industry SEIU Senate Democrats Senate Republicans Service Employees International Union Starbucks Starbucks strategy store by store top-down organizing UAW federal investigation Union union contract union convictions union election union label union malfeasance union promises union representation union salt union shop Workers United

    Press Release ● Unionization

    Special Alert: Foundation Offers Free Legal Aid to Amy’s Kitchen Employees Targeted by Teamsters Union Bosses

    April 11, 2022 // Teamsters’ aggressive top-down organizing campaign includes boycott threat, seeks to impose union on workers without even a secret-ballot vote

    AFL-CIO Amy’s Kitchen big labor boycott threat CA California Card Check corporate campaign election. federal courts Jennifer Abruzzo Joy Silk Local 665 Mark Mix National Labor Relations Board National Right to Work Foundation National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Oregon organizing campaign organizing guide President Biden rights to resist Santa Rosa Secret Ballot Teamsters Teamsters Local 665 Teamsters Union Union union cards

    Blog Op-ed / Commentary ● PRO Act Unions

    Contesting the PRO Act’s Coercive Vision

    April 1, 2022 // The Employee Rights Act presents a firm contrast with the vision outlined in the PRO Act and supported by Big Labor and its allies in Congress and the Biden administration. Where the PRO Act increases union financial coercion of workers to aid its political allies, the ERA reduces it. Where the PRO Act infringes on workers’ informed consent on union formation, the ERA protects it. Where the PRO Act limits worker privacy, the ERA expands it. Where the PRO Act fails to provide financial transparency and scrutiny in union operations, the ERA provides it. And where the PRO Act endorses Big Labor’s every-job-a-factory-job vision, the ERA promotes modern understandings of compensation and flexibility in working arrangements.

    AB5 Biden administration Big Factory model big labor business groups California Capital Research Center Card Check Communications Workers of America Congressional Democrats congressional Republicans contact information corporate campaign disclosure of worker information disruptive labor union power District of Columbia dues Employee Rights Act of 2025 ERA ex-SEIU local head Tyrone Freeman Federal campaign contributions Form T-1 Franchise franchising Guam independent contracting Joint Employer joint employment Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 labor-management training center LM-2 McDonald's Michael Watson opt in phone number PRO Act Protecting the Right to Organize Act refrain from funding union political and advocacy efforts Rick Allen right-to-work schedule Secondary boycotts Secret Ballot SEIU Service Employees International Union Supply chain Supreme Court decision Tim Scott transparency on the nature of union-organizing cards Trump Administration U.S. Senate UAW UAW Corruption union card signature union-organized employment