Posts tagged union organizing
Now eligible for a union, legislative staffers are organizing across California
July 9, 2026 // The organizing campaign is still in its early stages: District staffers in the Bay Area are having one-on-one conversations with their colleagues in Southern California district offices; Capitol-based staffers are discussing priorities for the would-be union, and organizers are weighing options about which union they might eventually join.
The Texas Case That Could Bring Down the NLRB
June 13, 2026 // That’s the reality of a May decision by a U.S. district court in Fort Worth in the case Aunt Bertha v. National Labor Relations Board. The court ruled that the NLRB – the main government agency overseeing union organizing and collective bargaining in the private sector – is unconstitutional on multiple counts. This case seems destined to head to the Supreme Court, and if it does, Congress may have to rewrite federal labor law to meet workers’ needs in the 21st century.
More transparency for the largest unions
May 31, 2026 // A new rule from the Labor Department will recalibrate the disclosure reports that labor unions are required to file. It’s a welcome update to ensure that union members know how their money is being spent. What will happen in the 2026 midterms? Sign up for Margin of Victory The reason unions have government-mandated disclosure requirements is that they are government-backed monopolies. Labor relations law gives unions exclusive power as the sole bargaining agent for the entire workplace.
NLRB General Counsel Requests Reversal of Ban on Employer “Captive Audience” Meetings During Union Organizing Drives
May 20, 2026 // The General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board” or “NLRB”) is signaling a significant shift in federal labor policy by taking the position that two Biden-Era Board decisions—both of which imposed new restrictions on employers fighting union drives—were wrongfully decided. In challenging the Board’s 2024 NLRB decisions in Amazon.com Services LLC and Siren Retail Corp., General Counsel Crystal Carey argues that the Board improperly departed from longstanding precedent. Amazon.com Services LLC, 373 NLRB No. 136 (Nov. 13, 2024) A “captive audience” meeting is a mandatory meeting held during working time in which an employer addresses employees during a union organizing campaign and expresses its views opposing unionization. For more than 75 years, the Board considered such meetings lawful under settled precedent. Mandatory captive audience meetings were a common and effective tool used by employers to respond to union organizing efforts. In November 2024, however, the Board’s Democrat majority reversed that longstanding precedent in Amazon.com Services, LLC and held that requiring employees to attend anti-union meetings could unlawfully interfere with employees’ Section 7 rights under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) (see client alert here).
US court nixes NLRB ruling allowing for unionizing without elections
March 10, 2026 // A U.S. appeals court has ruled that the National Labor Relations Board overstepped its powers when it issued a major ruling requiring employers that violate labor laws during union organizing drives to bargain with unions even when workers vote against joining them. The Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 ruling, opens new tab on Friday called the board's 2023 decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific "rulemaking under the guise of an adjudication" that went far beyond the NLRB's authority to issue fact-based rulings and specific remedies in individual cases.
The Absurdity of the Nation’s Largest Teachers’ Union
December 3, 2025 // Membership training for the National Education Association (NEA), America’s largest teachers’ union, makes the organization’s priorities unmistakably clear. Defending Education, a watchdog group, recently obtained pre-attendance and participant materials for the NEA’s training session, “Advancing LGBTQ+ Justice,” which begins today. The documents, considered alongside other union programming, reveal the NEA’s fixation on identity politics.
Size Matters: Workers at Smaller Museums Are Happier, New Survey Finds
October 31, 2025 // “Fifty-five percent of unions at art museums were formed in the last five years.” Non-union staff, the report found, earn about 78 percent of what their unionized counterparts make, though unionized workers tend to report higher levels of dissatisfaction overall.
Podcast: Championing Worker Freedom Across The States: Alan Jernigan and Vincent Vernuccio on ALEC TV
August 23, 2025 // As debates over worker rights ripple across the country, one message continues to echo from state to state: workers deserve the freedom to choose the work arrangements that fit their lives best. But how should lawmakers turn that principle into policy?
Sen. Hawley Introduces Bill to Raise Minimum Wage to $15
June 10, 2025 // Some business advocacy groups still oppose minimum rate hikes, including Hawley's proposed bill. "This proposal would more than double the minimum wage and slash over 800,000 jobs," Rebekah Paxton, research director at the Employment Policies Institute, said in a statement to The Hill. "An overwhelming majority of economists agree that drastic minimum wage hikes cut employment, limit opportunities for workers and shutter businesses."
Misread: How Legal Authorities Allowed Tyranny of the Minority to Subvert Worker Enfranchisement
June 10, 2025 // It is time to bring worker enfranchisement to unions across the country. In a new report co-published by Institute for the American Worker and Mackinac Center, author Steve Delie outlines how union organizing should be held to a higher threshold, requiring unions to win a majority of all employees at a job site or, at a minimum, require a quorum of those workers to vote in order to organize them. Delie shows the current majority of votes approach is contrary to the plain language of the National Labor Relations Act, the federal law that governs private sector unions. The NLRA clearly requires a “majority of the employees in a unit” to certify a union.