Posts tagged OPM
Breaking: Government Report Reveals Over $180 Million Spent on Taxpayer-funded Collective Bargaining Costs
February 10, 2026 // The report details the scope and cost of taxpayer-funded collective bargaining activities across the federal government for Fiscal Year 2024. Federal agencies reported approximately $181.6 million in collective bargaining-related expenses paid by American taxpayers. Such spending included time devoted to negotiations, grievances, and arbitration, and related costs such as travel and office space- detailed expenses previously unknown to the public. I4AW’s Vinnie Vernuccio released the following statement: “I applaud OPM for shining a light on the cost of collective bargaining. Now we can begin to closely examine these expenses and allow the public to determine whether or not these costs are a justified use of taxpayer money.”
OPM Issues Final Rule Which Allows Agencies to Remove Workers Who Refuse to Implement the will of the American People
February 6, 2026 // I4AW’s commentary was referenced or quoted seven times in the final rule! The rule, called “Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil Service,” authorizes agencies to move policy-influencing positions into Schedule Policy/Career, which will “allow agencies to quickly remove employees from critical positions who engage in misconduct, perform poorly, or obstruct the democratic process by intentionally subverting Presidential directives.” Institute for the American Worker submitted a formal comment when the proposed rule was first announced, providing arguments on the need for accountability regarding obstructive government workers.
Education IT, tech employees lose union protections
February 4, 2026 // Legal challenges to the order are still playing out in court. The Trump administration maintains the president has the authority to end collective bargaining rights under the 1978 Civil Service Reform Act, which exempts national security roles from union protection.
Congress guarantees furloughed feds’ back pay despite continued White House maneuvering
February 3, 2026 // The Office of Personnel Management removed citations of the 2019 Federal Employee Fair Treatment Act from its shutdown guidance last month, as the Trump administration continues to insist that the law guaranteeing all federal employees back pay after a shutdown doesn’t.
Trump lauds ‘tremendous’ federal workforce cuts. Good government group calls them ‘disturbing.’
January 21, 2026 // Going forward, the Trump administration is looking to make further changes for the federal workforce, including overhauls to the probationary period and federal hiring processes, as well as performance management and senior executive development. OPM’s Kupor said the upcoming changes will make government “leaner,” while making federal employees more results-oriented, accountable and efficient.
NTEU sues OPM for Schedule F records
November 18, 2025 // The federal employee union said the government’s dedicated HR agency ignored an August Freedom of Information Act request pertaining to which positions agencies plan to convert to the controversial new job classification.
Unions sue over Trump administration’s political ‘loyalty’ hiring plan
November 7, 2025 // Unions representing federal workers filed a lawsuit on Thursday challenging a decision by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to include what they said is a partisan "loyalty question" in more than 1,700 job posts since October's start.
Union call to reopen government exposes pain point for Democrats
October 29, 2025 // Democrats wrestle with whether to extend health subsidies for millions or leave more than 1 million federal workers without pay
The Federal Workforce Will Be a Little Smaller After the Government Shutdown Ends
October 16, 2025 // While further reductions in the size of the federal workforce are certainly welcome, the layoffs will have to become significantly more aggressive to more than scratch the federal Leviathan. While smaller than its peak at 3.4 million workers in 1990 and then again in 2010, the federal government still employed 2.9 million people, not counting military personnel, as of August 2025. That's almost 3 million people living off the taxes collected by the federal government (or, increasingly, the money it borrows) rather than productively creating goods and services for willing consumers. And those nearly 3 million people aren't all just sitting around. Too many of them get up to mischief by exercising the power of the government to interfere in people's lives and to enforce intrusive rules and laws. Just see my comment above about the public health establishment and the pandemic. Fewer federal employees mean not so many mischief-makers to cause trouble, along with some cost savings.
Proposed review to modernize federal workers’ pay shot down by unions, Sen. Curtis says
October 14, 2025 // Despite having support leading up to the vote, the American Federation of Government Employees, the largest federal employee union in the country, sent a message to senators opposing the amendment — which Curtis said prompted many of his Democratic colleagues to taper off. The group argued the amendment would “open up the federal pay system” to systemic audits and reviews by the Trump administration, which it says would be “devastating for federal workers.” Rather than ensuring higher pay, the AFGE claimed the Trump administration would use it to justify pay cuts or even freeze some spending altogether.