Posts tagged union dues

    Caregivers sue state over ‘false’ public employee classification

    October 20, 2025 // The practice drew widespread condemnation when the Mackinac Center brought it to light early in the previous decade. But the SEIU refused to accept defeat after the Legislature ended the practice. The union struck back with a 2012 ballot initiative that failed by a 56% to 44% vote. Following that failure, SEIU used various means to keep alive the idea that home care workers are employees of the government. The union got its second chance last year, when the Democratic trifecta under Gov. Gretchen Whitmer quietly enacted laws classifying home care workers as public employees and opening caregivers’ personal records to the union. As happened in 2005, the SEIU got its win, but with a very small vote.

    VIDEO: California Caregiver Exposes SEIU 2015 for Coercion and Silencing Members

    October 13, 2025 // In a video released today by the Freedom Foundation, Chaquan May, a California mother and in-home healthcare provider for her medically fragile daughter, exposes how SEIU 2015 has ignored, coerced, and trapped her in union membership against her will. May recounts how, despite multiple attempts to opt out over the past two years, the union continues to withhold dues and refuses to acknowledge her requests.

    Testimony: Rachel Greszler: Labor Law Reform Part 1: Diagnosing the Issues, Exploring Current Proposals

    October 10, 2025 // SummaryToday’s challenges—from the rise of artificial intelligence to the expansion of independent work and the growing demand for flexibility, autonomy, and new skills—necessitate modernized labor laws that are pro-worker and pro-employer, regardless of the type of workplace. Heavy-handed government interventions and attempts to bring back the 1950s’ ways of work are not the answers. American labor laws should preserve the freedom, dignity, and opportunity that make American work exceptional.

    agency shop Alexander T. MacDonald arbitration panel Artificial Intelligence Association Health Plans Act automation autonomy BLS California Chattanooga collective bargaining agreement condition of employment Congress contract ratification DEI disabled discriminate DOL economic conditions Employee Rights Act entrepreneurship F. Vincent Vernuccio Fairness and Transparency Office federal labor law Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service FLCA flexibility forced arbitration freedom of association freedom of speech gig workers health and safety Heritage Foundation independent contracting Independent Retirement Fairness Act injury rates Janus v. AFSCME joint-employer standard Labor Law Reform NLRA older opt-out overweight paid family leave personal information political activities politicization pregnant presidential administrations private businesses pro-employer pro-worker productivity Public Sector Workers quotas Raise Act regulation remote work Rewarding Achievement and Incentivizing Successful Employees (RAISE) Act right-to-work SALT Act Save Local Business Act secret ballot elections self-employment Senate Health Education Labor and Pensions Committee Senate Hearing Strikes Supreme Court Tennessee testimony U.S. citizens UAW unelected bureaucrats union dues union extortion union shop union violence union wage premium Unionization Unlocking Benefits for Independent Workers Act Volkswagen Wage and Hour Division Warehouse Worker Protection Act warehouses Worker Enfranchisement Act workplace benefits

    Commentary: When fighting Trump, take union claims with a grain of salt

    October 7, 2025 // Government unions faced another momentous reform seven years ago when the Supreme Court ruled in Janus v. AFSCME. The court held that public sector workers have a First Amendment right to completely withdraw from union membership and dues. In essence, the court created a nationwide right-to-work law for all public sector workers, including teachers, police officers, firefighters, and all other federal, state, and local government workers. No longer would they have to join or pay a union to keep their job. Government unions hated this ruling, of course. In a desperate attempt to sway the Supreme Court, union-paid prognosticators predicted massive negative economic effects if the court ruled against unions.

    Banning Forced Union Dues Found to Increase Investment by 68-82%

    September 10, 2025 // “Using Census Bureau data, Drs. Maksimovic and Yang found that plants subjected to union monopoly bargaining have ‘lower and less effective incentives’ for employees. Consequently, unionized plants experience ‘higher rates of closure, reduced investment, and slower employment growth.’ “Right to Work laws significantly reduce the financial reward Big Labor reaps by securing monopoly-bargaining power over private-sector employees, because individual employees retain the freedom not to bankroll the union. Right to Work laws also inhibit the ability of union bosses to secure such privileges in an organizing campaign.

    Op-ed: Stanford’s Graduate Student Union Tries to Stifle Dissent

    September 4, 2025 // At the University of Chicago, graduate students in a similar position have taken their union to federal court, arguing that forced support of the union violates their constitutional rights. In Graduate Students for Academic Freedom v. Graduate Students United, the plaintiffs—including Jewish students—say they are being compelled to fund a union that promotes the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel, a stance they view as antisemitic. The graduate unions at both Stanford and Chicago are registered as local chapters of the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, a national union that funds progressive activism.

    A ‘Copy And Paste’ Campaign? – Opponents ‘Flood The U.S. Department Of Labor With Identical Comments Against Proposed Union Rule

    September 2, 2025 // During the month-long comment period, a total of 299 comments were received and all can be viewed on line. Interestingly, over a quarter of the comments (78) were submitted by “anonymous,” which is problematic for a number of reasons including the inability to verify whether the same commenter submitted multiple comments. Actually, of those who did identify themselves, 20 commenters filed 41 comments. Most disturbing, however, is that there appears to have been a concerted effort to “juice” the number of comments against the rule change.

    Aaron Withe: Labor Day should honor workers, not the unions preying on them

    September 1, 2025 // These virtues, of course, depend on whether one is a victim or beneficiary of the billions of dollars in dues plundered every year from workers’ paychecks and diverted into labor barons’ pockets.

    NEW YORK: Opt-outs up by 63 percent

    August 25, 2025 // Compared to last July, opt-outs have surged 63 percent. Since just last month? Another 51 percent spike. This isn’t a one-off. It’s a movement. And if the pace continues, New York will crush last year’s totals. Union executives can’t ignore it. New Yorkers are waking up to where their dues are really going — political slush funds, six-figure union salaries and agendas that don’t represent them.

    The Buckeye Institute Wins Settlement in Education Union Dues Case

    August 25, 2025 // The Buckeye Institute won another legal victory, this time for Beth Queen, a science teacher in Poland, Ohio, and Buckeye’s client in Queen v. NEA. Immediately after The Buckeye Institute filed the case, the Ohio Education Association agreed to settle the dispute to Ms. Queen’s satisfaction. “With this settlement, the OEA properly recognized Ms. Queen’s claims and avoided costly and protracted litigation for all involved,” said Jay R. Carson, senior litigator at The Buckeye Institute and an attorney representing Ms. Queen.