Posts tagged unemployment insurance

    Independent Contractors Take Center Stage for ‘Empowering the American Worker’

    May 27, 2025 // However, expert witness Dr. Liya Palagashvili showed data of the deliberate harm done through California’s law AB5 and its ABC test that is also embedded in the federal Protecting the Right to Organize Act (PRO) Act and other statewide legislation seeking to restrict the work of independent professionals. Now, these results are causal, meaning we can definitely say that ABC tests cause these negative outcomes. No other studies to date have found positive employment effects from these laws. The research shows that restrictive ABC tests do not create more work opportunities. They eliminate both independent and W-2 jobs.

    CT Lawmakers Find the Line Between Governing and Union Organizing — and Cross It

    May 19, 2025 // Standing alongside Sen. Matt Lesser (D-Middletown) and Rep. Nick Gauthier (D–Waterford), and Sen. MD Rahman (D-Manchester), Sen. Kushner made it crystal clear where her priorities lie — not in brokering solutions, but in prolonging standoffs. “We’ve been fighting for Senate Bill 8,” she told the crowd, referring to her legislation. She framed it to protect workers — but in reality, it’s designed to help unions hold the line longer by forcing employers to bankroll the strikes being waged against them. Describing the bill as a response to a supposedly broken federal labor system, she even falsely claiming that “we don’t even have a Federal Labor Board” — using that to justify why Connecticut needs to “do everything” to support strikers, including paying them not to work.

    A ‘War’ on the Civil Service or Controlling a Powerful Union Political Machine?

    May 17, 2025 // Fed unions remain unable to strike — enforced by President Reagan’s firing striking air-traffic controllers — so unions became powerful in more subtle ways. A study by the Institute for the American Worker documents how Federal government unionization works today. “Generally, federal employees are not permitted to strike, and their unions are limited in what conditions of employment they may bargain over.” Management rights and other matters “specifically provided” for by federal statute are still not bargainable. “This includes pay, health insurance, retirement, and certain workplace insurance (e.g., workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance), among other benefits.” The study continues,

    Independent Women’s Forum Survey: 82% of Women Say Government Should Not Force Them into 9-to-5 Jobs

    May 6, 2025 // New Poll: 82% of Women Say Government Should Not Force Them into 9-to-5 Jobs Women, seniors, and overall voters almost universally say flexibility is important to them. The vast majority of Americans do not want the government to force people to work 9-to-5 jobs. Women, seniors, and overall voters almost universally say flexibility is important to them. Women and seniors support reforms that could expand benefits to independent contractors without risking their independent status.

    Connecticut workers rally for unemployment insurance after 2 weeks on strike

    April 20, 2025 // He added that those who are opposed to the bill are not against it because of how much it costs. “They are opposed because they don’t want things to be remotely fair,” Stanley said. “They want all the power on one side. All that has led to is growing inequality. We need a change across Connecticut and across this country.”

    Oregon and Washington workers may soon be able to claim unemployment benefits when they go on strike

    April 7, 2025 // Oregon’s measure would make it the first state to provide pay for picketing public employees — who aren’t allowed to strike in most states, let alone receive benefits for it. Washington’s would pay striking private sector workers for up to 12 weeks, starting after at least two weeks on the line.

    Backgrounder: Executive Order: Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs

    March 31, 2025 // The practice of “official time” is when unionized federal employees perform union-related activities, rather than their actual public service duties, while being paid by taxpayers. The Federal Unions EO requires that agencies, upon termination of an applicable collective bargaining agreement, reassign any workers who performed “official time” to positions where they perform solely agency business. It also contains language regarding existing grievance proceedings and allows for the head of each agency to submit a report to the President within 30 days highlighting any agency subdivisions that were not covered but should have been covered under the Federal Unions EO.

    Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response Air Force bargaining units BLM Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Bureau of Prisons CDC Civil Service Reform Act Coast Guard collective bargaining collective bargaining agreement conditions of employment Congress cost of bargaining Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Department of Defense Department of Energy Department of Health and Human Services Department of Homeland Security Department of Justice Department of State Department of the Interior DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Department of Veterans Affairs Departments of Defense Donald Trump EPA Executive Order FDA Federal Communications Commission Federal Emergency Management Agency federal labor-management relationships Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute federal unions Food Safety and Inspection Service Foreign Service Act GSA health insurance House Committee on Education and Workforce ICE insurance International Trade Administration at the Department of Commerce labor-management relations National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National Science Foundation National Treasury Employees Union NIH Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of General Counsel Office of Health Security Office of Homeland Security Situational Awareness Office of Refugee Resettlement Administration for Children and Families Office of the Chief Information Officer official time OPM pay Retirement S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Science and Technology Directorate smoking SSA Strike unemployment insurance United States Agency For International Development United States International Trade Commission US Marshalls USDA Virginia Foxx wages workers' compensation

    Worker rights? Racial bias? A law change for manicurists prompts debate, confusion

    February 17, 2025 // Since the beginning of the year, licensed manicurists and nail salon owners in Orange County and across the state have been confused about whether a change in state law allows the business practice of renting a booth to continue or not. After an exemption expired under state law, nail salon workers are now subject to a rigorous test to determine if they are independent contractors while licensed aestheticians, electrologists, barbers and cosmetologists remain exempted from it.

    Connecticut’s Nonsensical Plan to Subsidize Strikes

    January 17, 2025 // A proposed workers' rights bill will worsen Connecticut's affordability crisis and ignite labor unrest. Proposals to provide striking workers with unemployment benefits and set arbitrary regulations for warehouse workers threaten Connecticut’s economic future. On January 14, two bills advanced in the Labor Committee that might well be the spark that ignites widespread labor unrest, even as the push imposes heavier burdens on our state’s consumers and taxpayers.

    CA requires public school unionization lessons, bans mandatory anti-union work meetings

    January 2, 2025 // Two new laws — AB 800, signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2023, and now SB 399, signed into law by Newsom this year, are set to help maintain or even increase union membership in the state. AB 800, signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2023, requires California high school juniors and seniors to be taught about their workplace rights, the achievements of organized labor, and students’ right to join a union. Education site Chalkboard News used public records requests to discover what exactly this new law is having teachers cover.