Posts tagged workers’ compensation

    Republican senators unveil “portable benefits” bill for gig workers

    July 7, 2025 // Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-L.A.) unveiled a bill on Monday that would make it easier for companies to offer benefits to gig workers without making them full-fledged employees. Why it matters: As more Americans turn to gig work and self-employment, there's a growing push to get them access to things like paid sick leave, health insurance and retirement benefits. Zoom in: Called the Unlocking Benefits for Independent Workers Act, the bill is part of legislative package from Cassidy, along with Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). Both also plan on unveiling related bills Monday.

    Bill enabling unionization of ride-hail drivers takes big step

    June 17, 2025 // Under the bill, the state would require Uber, Lyft and other such companies on a quarterly basis to give to the Public Employment Relations Board a list of all California ride-hail drivers who have provided at least 20 rides in the preceding six months. The board would use that data to determine the median number of rides given by that pool of drivers. Under AB 1340 as it’s currently written, any driver who gave at least the median number of rides would be considered an active driver. An organization seeking to form a drivers union could then start the process by getting at least 10% of active drivers to authorize it to act as their representative.

    A ‘War’ on the Civil Service or Controlling a Powerful Union Political Machine?

    May 17, 2025 // Fed unions remain unable to strike — enforced by President Reagan’s firing striking air-traffic controllers — so unions became powerful in more subtle ways. A study by the Institute for the American Worker documents how Federal government unionization works today. “Generally, federal employees are not permitted to strike, and their unions are limited in what conditions of employment they may bargain over.” Management rights and other matters “specifically provided” for by federal statute are still not bargainable. “This includes pay, health insurance, retirement, and certain workplace insurance (e.g., workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance), among other benefits.” The study continues,

    Backgrounder: Executive Order: Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs

    March 31, 2025 // The practice of “official time” is when unionized federal employees perform union-related activities, rather than their actual public service duties, while being paid by taxpayers. The Federal Unions EO requires that agencies, upon termination of an applicable collective bargaining agreement, reassign any workers who performed “official time” to positions where they perform solely agency business. It also contains language regarding existing grievance proceedings and allows for the head of each agency to submit a report to the President within 30 days highlighting any agency subdivisions that were not covered but should have been covered under the Federal Unions EO.

    Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response Air Force bargaining units BLM Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Bureau of Prisons CDC Civil Service Reform Act Coast Guard collective bargaining collective bargaining agreement conditions of employment Congress cost of bargaining Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Department of Defense Department of Energy Department of Health and Human Services Department of Homeland Security Department of Justice Department of State Department of the Interior DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Department of Veterans Affairs Departments of Defense Donald Trump EPA Executive Order FDA Federal Communications Commission Federal Emergency Management Agency federal labor-management relationships Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute federal unions Food Safety and Inspection Service Foreign Service Act GSA health insurance House Committee on Education and Workforce ICE insurance International Trade Administration at the Department of Commerce labor-management relations National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National Science Foundation National Treasury Employees Union NIH Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of General Counsel Office of Health Security Office of Homeland Security Situational Awareness Office of Refugee Resettlement Administration for Children and Families Office of the Chief Information Officer official time OPM pay Retirement S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Science and Technology Directorate smoking SSA Strike unemployment insurance United States Agency For International Development United States International Trade Commission US Marshalls USDA Virginia Foxx wages workers' compensation

    Orange County legislator pushes to restore independent contractor status for manicurists

    March 13, 2025 // Ta, R-Westminster, has taken up an effort that he says would restore independence to California manicurists by challenging a state law he believes unfairly limits their ability to work on their own terms. AB 5, passed in 2019, aimed to tighten rules for independent contractors across various industries, including beauty. The law aimed to protect workers by ensuring they receive benefits like minimum wage, workers’ compensation and other labor rights — protections they could lose if classified as independent contractors. Its goal was to reduce exploitation and hold employers accountable for their responsibilities.

    Backgrounder: Modern Worker Security Act

    March 7, 2025 // Rep. Kiley’s legislation would ensure that the offer of portable benefits by companies would not be a factor in any calculation regarding the classification of a worker under “any federal law”—including the FLSA. The legislation defines portable benefits as a work-related benefit that stays with the worker regardless of whether they continue to perform work for that individual. Such work-related benefits can include “workers’ compensation, skills training, professional development, paid leave, disability coverage, health insurance coverage, retirement savings, income security, and short-term saving” or financial contributions toward such coverage—or a combination thereof.

    Worker rights? Racial bias? A law change for manicurists prompts debate, confusion

    February 17, 2025 // Since the beginning of the year, licensed manicurists and nail salon owners in Orange County and across the state have been confused about whether a change in state law allows the business practice of renting a booth to continue or not. After an exemption expired under state law, nail salon workers are now subject to a rigorous test to determine if they are independent contractors while licensed aestheticians, electrologists, barbers and cosmetologists remain exempted from it.

    CA requires public school unionization lessons, bans mandatory anti-union work meetings

    January 2, 2025 // Two new laws — AB 800, signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2023, and now SB 399, signed into law by Newsom this year, are set to help maintain or even increase union membership in the state. AB 800, signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2023, requires California high school juniors and seniors to be taught about their workplace rights, the achievements of organized labor, and students’ right to join a union. Education site Chalkboard News used public records requests to discover what exactly this new law is having teachers cover.

    Robert Boland: The future of college athlete pay hinges on the presidential election

    September 25, 2024 // Most athletes would stand to gain much more from the actions of the NLRB, which could permanently classify collegiate athletes as employees of their universities. This would afford them not only the right to wages but also additional employee benefits such as workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and the right to both unionize and collectively bargain with their schools. The Biden-Harris administration — as well as its NLRB appointees — has been very labor-friendly, and we could expect a Harris-Walz administration to maintain the same approach. However, Republican appointees would be more likely to reject unionization and maintain the NCAA’s status quo — however uncertain — without granting student-athletes employee status or benefits.